On the 25th of November 2025, Niki Savva launched her new book Earthquake at Paperchain Bookstore in Griffith, Canberra. The author's speech can be enjoyed below.

Niki Savva's speech at the launch of Earthquake
It is wonderful to be back at Paperchain, to be surrounded once again by so many friends, family, and people I admire.
I especially want to thank all those who have travelled from interstate to be here, particularly my brother, Steven — the only person left who has known me all my life and, I think, still loves me — and his youngest sons, my darling nephews, Thomas and Christian. Thanks also to my dear husband, Vincent Woolcock, who knows better than most the many challenges of life with a writer. His support and his confidence in me help make it all happen.
This is my fifth book, all published by the remorseless Henry Rosenbloom.
I met Henry more than 50 years ago when he worked for Moss Cass, a Whitlam Government minister.
We lost contact after the dismissal, then Henry rescued me from obscurity and unemployment 15 years ago when he agreed to publish my first book, So Greek. I was deeply grateful and continued the collaboration, partly because I am a firm believer in dancing with the one who brung ya.
It is my fifth book launched by Laurie Oakes, my friend of more than 50 years, my hero, and my teacher on the fine art of how best to prise information out of people who would rather keep it hidden. I only wish I could do it a fraction as well as he did.
Laurie also rescued me, way back in 1975. I was working on The Australian, and was demoted after the Dismissal. My future on the Oz, not for the first time and certainly not the last, looked pretty bleak. Soon after my demotion I quit the Oz, not for the last time.
Laurie, then bureau chief of the Sun News Pictorial, gave me a job. In 1976 I was the first woman to work in the paper’s Canberra bureau. The editor thought Laurie had hired me because we were having an affair. I have said it before and will say it again, although I loved Laurie from the moment I met him, it was not in that way.
I have also said it before and will say it again, because it is as true now as it was when he ruled the gallery for decades, whether in print or on TV, that he is the best of the best. Laurie’s contribution to political journalism cannot be overstated, and it should never be forgotten.
I know I said repeatedly after Bulldozed that it was definitely my last book.
But who could have predicted the magnitude of Labor’s victory on 3 May? Except of course, the prime minister. As he reminded me on a number of occasions. If there is any crow being served, I will chew on it.
The prime minister, and his team — Paul Erickson, Tim Gartrell, Fiona Sugden — with his key cabinet ministers in the frontline, deserved to win well.
It was a disciplined, well-structured campaign executed damn-near flawlessly, without missteps except for that one slip off the stage. Can’t resist mentioning that again.
Labor did not lose a single seat, and it won more seats than any other single party since Federation. It took the Liberals to the brink of extinction, stemmed the rise of the independents, and reduced the Greens to a party of protest in the Senate, which is where they began.
It destroyed the careers of present and future leaders of the left and the right.
It was no ordinary election, yet still there are people who carry on as if it was. The Liberals lost their progressive inner-urban heartland to the teals in 2022 and their suburban middle-Australia stranglehold to Labor in 2025. Now their conservative base is disintegrating.
Sussan Ley told her first party meeting after the election that they had reached rock bottom. As with so many other things, she also got this wrong. The Coalition’s primary vote at the election was 31.8 per cent. Now it’s around 24 per cent. Take out the Nationals’ vote, and it’s around 20 per cent.
With the Libs now able to fit its MPs in a minibus, as Simon Kennedy says, this might look pretty good in a few months’ time after the South Australia election, where Liberals fear they could end up with zero seats.
And in November, if Jess Wilson fails to defeat an ageing, incompetent government, then, as one senior Liberal said to me, they really will be on the path to oblivion.
The federal result reflected the performance of the leader and the calibre of the campaign, which was the worst in living memory.
The question is why? Why did the Coalition vote against a tax cut and promise to repeal it?
Why did they pledge to end working from home, then take so long to dump it?
Why were there so few policies? Why did Dutton refuse to appear at the National Press Club, and why did he avoid press conferences in Canberra?
I think I have managed to provide some answers in Earthquake.
What never fails to amaze me is that different leaders make the same mistakes. They don’t trust their colleagues to do their jobs, they cede too much authority to staff who are not always up to their jobs, and they either spurn advice or listen to the wrong people. They take all criticism personally — even when it is meant to help them — and whatever judgement they had before they became the leader deserts them almost as soon as they get the top job.
Years ago, I confessed that I found Dutton thoroughly engaging. Privately, he was and remains funny and open. He had a dark sense of humour, which every good cop and journalist needs to get through dark times. It has perplexed a few of his colleagues, and angered others, that he has managed to maintain his equilibrium in the wake of such a devastating result.
He told me he meditates and exercises every day, and he does seem at peace with it all.
Unlike his surviving colleagues, who now face a monumental and perhaps insurmountable rebuilding task, and who have a very different perspective from him on what went wrong. Which, basically, was everything, as James Paterson later admitted.
The Coalition remains fragile, and the Liberal Party is still in danger of splitting or disappearing. Andrew Hastie believes it is possible that the party of Menzies, which he says he is committed to recreating, could become extinct.
Malcolm Turnbull is convinced the battle has already been fought and won. By the right, and that the party could be done for. He says the success of the teals shows there is a market for a new, genuinely liberal centrist party, but insists — albeit with a sense of regret, it seems to me — that he is too old to be its founding father. In any case the teals, now considering saddling up to challenge Hansonites in the Senate, see nothing in it for them to hook up with moderate Liberals.
The Liberal Party needs a strong leader who commands respect with a firm policy grounding, and an ability to advocate and compromise without fear of edging to the centre. Sussan Ley does not fit that bill.
She did not once privately or publicly articulate her position on net zero. In the budget lockup in March, she supported Dutton spending more money on defence, but also thought it was a good idea to do something on the cost of living. She became the invisible woman during the campaign. According to colleagues, she or her office leaked against the leader, and she canvassed votes for the leadership ahead of the election she deduced they would lose. She is not without cunning and determination.
Although a few Liberal women have changed their mind on quotas, she is not one of them, asserting she is both an agnostic and a zealot. The photos of children starving in Gaza were distressing, but it took days for her to say they were starving. And Donald Trump got there before her. Can you see the pattern here?
She has also foreshadowed a debate on immigration. I challenge anyone to nominate a time, from the arrival of the First Fleet, through the Gold Rush, to the post-war mass-migration period, to a few weeks ago, to yesterday in the Senate, when Australia has ever been able to have a sensible, bigot-free debate on immigration.
None of this means that Labor can take its re-election for granted. That would be a dereliction of duty.
They have a mandate to implement their election promises, but also an obligation to change what needs to be changed. If the pressure is not applied externally, it will come internally.
It will be an interesting time. To those who ask if there will be another book, and given I have spent more than 50 years trying to tell politicians what to do, the best I can do now is quote Mick Jagger:
I told you once and I told you twice
But you never listen to my advice,
You don’t try very hard to please me
With what you know, it should be easy.
So this could be the last time, it may be the last time, I don’t know.
Thomas and Christian, I will tell you later who Mick Jagger is. Thank you, Paperchain, for hosting again, and thank you all very much for coming.
— Niki Savva





